COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION

Paper details:

Instructions Comprehensive Report In this course, you are asked to prepare a Final Project (Comprehensive Report), which is made up of various scenarios throughout each unit. Each unit (i.e., units II through VIII) contains a scenario for you to solve and to provide recommendations. By the end of the course, you are asked to collect all of the individual responses from each scenario and to insert them into a Comprehensive Report. The Final Project (Comprehensive Report) requires each of the following: Title page (APA format) Executive Summary (summarize the entire report by briefly identifying the main points of each individual report) Table of Contents Each of the individual reports (with any necessary corrections/improvements) Each appendix from the individual reports (with any necessary corrections/improvements) The purpose of this Project and its constituent reports is to provide you with an opportunity to gather data, calculate data, make recommendations, and prepare reports as an advanced safety professional. Once complete, keep your Comprehensive Report as a demonstration of your ability to perform as an advanced safety professional, as well as a representation of your attention to detail. Bosses like that kind of thing, and so do future employers. please check the feedback from previous papers. Thank you

xxxxxxxxxx

1
Running head: COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
Jose Lopez
Columbia Southern University
August 8, 2020
71%
YOU DID NOT DO PART OF THE ASSIGNMENT THAT I DEDUCTED 20 POINTS
FOR. YOU ALSO DID NOT COMPLETE SOME OTHER WORK.
YOU NEED TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF YOUR REPORTS AND READ THE
ASSIGNMENTS TO MAKE SURE YOU DO ALL THE PARTS.
SEE COMMENTS FOR DEDUCTIONS.
2
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
Comprehensive Safety Evaluation for Acme Manufacturing Company
The report on comprehensive safety evaluation for Acme Manufacturing Co. was
commissioned to study and determine employees’ exposure to various particulates and gases, in
addition to the effectiveness of the current ventilation systems and the related business impact
thereof. This was initiated by Be Safe Consulting Inc. (BSCI) on behalf of Acme Manufacturing
Co. with the final report directed to Bob Sanders, the supervising Certified Safety Professional
(CSP) who will submit the final report to Be Safe Consulting, Inc. (BSCI) Board of Directors.
Overview on Why Iron oxide Safety Evaluation for the Acme Manufacturing
Company employees was commissioned USE APA FORMAT FOR HEADINGS AND
SUBHEADINGS – WILL DEDUCT IN FUTURE
1. To ensure all employees are protected from toxicity derived from continuous
inhalation of these toxic iron oxide particles which predisposes them to inflammation and
pulmonary infections.
2. To ensure full productivity of all Acme Manufacturing Company employees since all
employees will be fully operating within a framework of safe environment with the highest
3
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
standards of safety, hence reducing stress on the human resource.
3. To limit environmental pollution by emitting toxic particulate deposits of iron oxide to
the environment, this has hazardous impact both to the environmental and the entire ecosystem.
The safety of the entire population and the community is a priority for the company.
4. In order to reduce absenteeism and the huge medical bills the company would be
incurring on the employees, as a result of medical implications from exposure to harmful
chemicals arising from poor ventilation of the work space.
5. Meeting the ISO standards for the global best practices in a work space by ensuring
that, the company meets its obligation to both its internal and external operational environment
certified to all companies emitting particulate matter to the environment.
Ventilation room:
Wielding:
The employees’ actual exposure to iron oxide was as follows;
Booth #1 Anne Welding
Exposure = (C1T1 + C2T2 +………CnTn)/8 DEFINE VARIABLES -1 POINT
Exposure = {(4.3*150) + (3.7*150) + (2.2*240)}/ (60*8)
(645 + 555 + 528)/480
= 3.6mg/m^3 WHAT “=”? PLEASE USE SUPERSCRIPT TOOL IN WORD, like this >
mg/m3
4
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
Booth #2 Frank Wordly
Exposure = {(2.1*180) + (2.8*120) + (3.1*240)}/ (60*8)
(378 + 336 + 744)/480
= 1.55mg/m^3
Booth #3 Jim Young
Exposure = {(1.7*205) + (1.25*125) + (1.03*150)} + (60*8)
Exposure = (348.5 + 156.25 + 154.5)/480
= 1.373mg/m^3
Booth #4 Betty Johnson
Exposure = {(12.8*65) + (11.2*72) + (9.8*123)}/ (60*8)
Exposure = (2112+806.4 + 1205.4)/480
= 8.59mg/m^3
Booth #5 Jack Jones
Exposure = {(7.8*190) + (14.2*149) + (8.8*140)}/ (60*8)
Exposure = (1482 + 2115.8 + 1232)/480
= 10.06mg/m^3
WHERE IS BOOTH #6 OR A COMMENT REGARDING WHY IT WAS NOT DONE?
-3 POINTS
5
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
THE NEXT PART OF THE ASSIGNMENT WAS TO COMPLETE THE TABLE
WITH THE UNKNOWNS, WHICH YOU DID NOT DO. -20 POINTS
Hazardous materials storage
Recommended air flow rate should be as per the calculations below;
Room Volume= Length*Width*Height
=22*30*14 WHAT = ?
=9240ft^3
Flow Rate= Air exchange rate*Room volume/60
=12*9240/60
=1848ft^3/min NOT SURE WHAT YOU ARE EQUALING HERE, AND YOU DID NOT
FINISH THE PROBLEM. YOU TO HAVE STATED THIS IN TERMS OF ROOM CHANGES
PER HOUR -5 POINTS
Conclusion from the calculations
1.All the employees are within the iron oxide exposure limit except Jack Jones, positioned at
booth #5 whose PEL exposure limit is slightly beyond the required permissible exposure
limit(PEL) of 10mg/m^3.
2. With the hazardous storage area, the combined flow rate is 1847ft^3/min and 1848 ft^3/min is
within the required rate.
Recommendations from this analysis:
6
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
1.A proper undertaking should be implemented to ensure that the PEL of all employees are
within the recommended iron oxide permissible exposure limit(PEL) of 10mg/m^3 and all the
required resources and expertise should be availed towards that agenda for safety of all
employees.
2. Foundry Room should be designed in a way that facilitates air to be discharged to a location
from which it cannot again be drawn in by the ventilation system. Air should be exhausted into
an attic or crawl space.
References
Daily Advisor

How to Calculate PELs for Air Contaminants

IJOEM, T. (2010). Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety. The International
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1(4),204-205.
7
COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/ventilation/units.html?=undefined&wbdisable=true
. xxxxxxxxxx

1
Running head: RADIATION SAFETY REPORT
Radiation Safety Report
Jose Lopez
Columbia Southern University
August 17, 2020
APA RULE VIOLATIONS: -1 POINT
THIS IS A TECHNICAL REPORT, NOT AN ESSAY. MOST OF THE CONTENT
OF THIS REPORT DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS ITEMS RELATED TO THE
PROJECT -2 POINTS (GET RID OF ALL THE FLUFF)
BREAK UP REPORT USING APA HEADINGS AND SUBHEADINGS
DID NOT SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS -10 POINTS
87%
2
RADIATION SAFETY REPORT
Radiation safety report.
PLEASE READ MY AUG 8 POST Industries handling radioactive components often
contain risk factors. The main risk in these kinds of industries is the health effects that result
from exposure to radiation over a long period (Wakeford, 2009). The main reason for
conducting this research at Acme Manufacturing Co was to determine employee exposure to
radiation and find out the best ways of keeping the employee safe while handling daily tasks.
Radiation safety entails the protection of those who work in the radiation zone against getting
ionised by the radiation beams (Frane& Bitterman, 2020). The radiation safety matter is
globally tracked by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic
radiation (UNSCEAR) (Charles,2001). The main methods that are used to ensure the safety
of the workers include: increasing the distance where the employee operates from the source
of radiation, placing a shielding element between the radiation source and the employee
working zone, and providing efficient training for the employee to be well informed of the
safety measures(Szarmach et al., 2015). Reducing the duration of employee exposure is also
one of the best methods to ensure safety. The reason why radiation is one of the most health
hazards is its silence; it is odourless and does not have any indicators of danger. Thus it can
easily be ignored while it continues to danger the lives of a large population of employees
(Shabani et al., 2018).
Two subsequent studies were carried out in the Acme Manufacturing Co. The first
research was aimed at finding employee’s exposure to radiation. The other research was to
find out the effectiveness of engineering controls, including the shielding and other measures
that are in place to ensure the safety of the employees (Kumar, 2017). While at the company,
it was noted that the company has an on-site test equipment and repair facility. Most of the
testing machine had a radiation source. The primary measure used to protect the employees
from exposure was reducing the time of exposure to the radiation beams. Albeit it was their
sole method, the company sought better means of ensuring safety. They suggested the
3
RADIATION SAFETY REPORT
installation of shielding elements, particularly lead material; another approach was to increase
the distance from the source of the radiation beams. These two methods would enable the
workers to continue doing their work for a longer duration while ensuring their safety (Frane
& Bitterman).
The study was done at three different locations: the distance from the source of the
beam was analysed with regards to the intensity of the radiation beams. It was compared to a
new range which was proposed to be the further distance where the employee would be
working from if the intensity reduced to a safer value. The following results were found.
Table 1.0 NOT APA FORMAT, DATA GOOD

Note. The central concept used to find the value is the inverse square law [see the appendix].
The second option that was proposed to be implemented as a safety measure was to
install lead shields to bring down the level of the worker’s dose rate. The proposed method
was practically tried out by placing a 5-centimetre lead shield between the source of the
radiation and the workplace without changing the initial distance from the source to the
workplace. Subsequently, a test was done with the integration with the new proposed range to
find out its effectiveness at a longer distance. The following results were found.
4
RADIATION SAFETY REPORT
Table 2.0

See the appendix for calculations.
The second category of the research involved finding the power density for both the
near and far-fields. The following table shows the results of the analysis.
Table 3.0

See the appendix for the formula.
As the results indicated, it is recommended that the company install lead shield as
well as increase the distance from the source of the radiation to the place where employees
operate. This reduced the exposure intensity by a significant value, thus allowing the
employee to work for a longer duration without imposing danger to oneself.
5
RADIATION SAFETY REPORT
References.
Charles, M. (2001). UNSCEAR Report 2000: sources and effects of ionising radiation.
Journal of Radiological Protection, 21(1),
83.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0952-4746/21/1/609/meta
Frane, N., & Bitterman, A. (2020). Radiation safety and protection. In StatPearls [Internet].
StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889843/
Kumar, A. (2017). Gamma-ray shielding properties of PbO-Li2O-B2O3 glasses. Radiation
Physics and Chemistry, 136, 50-
53.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X16304145
Shabani, F., Hasanzadeh, H., Emadi, A., Mirmohammadkhani, M., Bitarafan-Rajabi, A.,
Abedelahi, A., … & Sanchooli, M. (2018). Radiation protection knowledge, attitude,
and practice (KAP) in interventional radiology. Oman Medical Journal, 33(2), 141.
Szarmach, A., Piskunowicz, M., Świętoń, D., Muc, A., Mockałło, G., Dzierżanowski, J., &
Szurowska, E. (2015). Radiation safety awareness among medical staff. Polish
journal of radiology, 80,
57.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315635/
Wakeford, R. (2009). Radiation in the workplace—a review of studies of the risks of
occupational exposure to ionising radiation. Journal of Radiological Protection,
29(2A), A61.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S05/meta
6
RADIATION SAFETY REPORT
Appendix
YOU NEED TO SHOW ALL WORK (EVERY CALCULATION IN LINE-BYLINE FORMAT). -10 POINTS
This appendix includes the formulas used to work out the calculations in all the tables
in this document.
Calculating the proposed new distance of employee workplace from the source of
radiation.
This uses the formula of inverse law. Square law. I1d21=I2d22, where d1 is the initial distance and
I1, is the initial intensity. By cross multiplying, the results of the final proposed density are
found.
Calculating the new intensity and initial intensity with a 5cm lead shield place
between the source and the detector.
This is found by: D =D0e – μx
where, D = dose rate (or intensity) with shielding, D0 = dose rate (or intensity)
without shielding, x = thickness of shielding, and μ = linear attenuation coefficient.
Calculating the power density for near fields and far fields
The maximum power density in the near field is given by PDnf= (16ε P)/ (π D²)
PD=’PtGt / 4piR2 gives the maximum power density for the far field

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Get professional assignment help cheaply

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.

Why choose our academic writing service?

• Plagiarism free papers
• Timely delivery
• Any deadline
• Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
• Subject-relevant academic writer
• Adherence to paper instructions
• Ability to tackle bulk assignments
• Reasonable prices
• 24/7 Customer Support
• Get superb grades consistently